Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Chris Muthendu & 5 others v Banking, Insurance & Finance Union (k) & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts) Petition 293 of 2009 CHRIS MUTHENDU............................................................. 1ST PETITIONER ALEXIUS KIPCHUMBA SAPIRII ..........................................2ND PETITIONER SAMUEL WANYOIKE WAINAINA..........................................3RD PETITIONER HENRY RIUNGU MUTHAURA ..............................................4RD PETITIONER VINCENT MANIAGI.................................................................5TH PETITIONER BONIFACE MIDO ....................................................................6TH PETITIONER VERSUS BANKING, INSURANCE & FINANCE UNION (K) ..........................................................1ST RESPONDENT THE MINISTER FOR LABOUR..........................................2ND RESPONDENT AND KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL FOOD & ALLIED WORKERS UNION ................................... 1ST INTERESTED PARTY THE KENYA BANKERS ASSOCIATION ................2ND INTERESTED PARTY THE INDUSTRIAL COURT ..................................... 3RD INTERESTED PARTY RULING In the petition dated 14th May 2009 filed on15th May 2009 the Petitioners herein seek the following orders: 1. That this Honourable court be pleased to order the application herein be certified urgent, notice of this application in the 1st instance be dispensed with and this application be heard ex parte in the 1st instance. 2. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a conservatory order staying the

page 1 of 2

implementation and all processes touching on the Legal Gazette Notice Number 924 of 6 th February 2009 purporting to effect agency fees against various unionisable bank employees pending the hearing and final determination of this application. 3. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a conservatory Order staying the negotiations on Collective bargaining Agreements for the period of 2009 to 2011 by the Trade unions of the employer banks and the employees of banks pending the hearing and final determination of this application. 4. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a conservatory order staying the implementation and all processes touching on the Legal Notice Number 924 of 6 th February 2009 purporting to effect agency fees against various unionisable bank employees pending the hearing and final determination of the petition. 5. That this Honourable Court be pleased to grant a conservatory Order staying the negotiations on Collective Bargaining Agreements for the period of 2009 to 2011 by the trade unions of the employer banks and the unionized employees of banks pending the hearing and final determination of the petition herein. 6. That this Honourable Court be pleased to direct that the industrial cause number 121 (N) of 2008 be heard and disposed off expeditiously and/or to direct that the parties herein do make their submissions on the main issue of recognition dispute between the 1 st respondent and the 1st interested party. 7. That this Honourable Court be pleased to make further Orders in the interest of justice of the parties involved and/or affected by this suit. 8. That costs of this application be provided for in favour of the petitioner/applicants. When the petition came up before me on 29th January 2012, only the 1st respondent and the Interested Parties were represented. Although the petitioners were duly served there was no appearance on their behalf and counsel for the said respondent and interested parties applied for the dismissal of the petition. There is evidence that Patrick Maina & Co. Advocates were duly served with the hearing notice. The record of these proceedings clearly show that the Petitioners are not keen in prosecuting this Petition. Accordingly I do not see any reason why this Petition should be allowed to continue hibernating in our registry shelves. In the premises I accede to the prayer by the 1st respondent and the interested parties and order that this petition be and is hereby dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent and the interested partes. G V ODUNGA JUDGE Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 5th day of February 2013 J B HAVELOCK JUDGE Delivered in the presence of:

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.