REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nyeri Criminal Case 35 of 2010 REPUBLIC...….………...........................….........................PROSECUTOR Versus SAMSON GATIMU MUNGUNA.….....……...........................…ACCUSED RULING 1. At the close of the prosecution case both the advocates for the accused and the state chose not to make any submissions on no case to answer and having heard the six (6) prosecution witnesses I have no doubt in my mind that the prosecution has established a prima facie case to enable me put the accused person on his defence. 2. I therefore find that the accused has a case to answer and therefore the same is reminded of his rights under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 24th day of January 2013. J. WAKIAGA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.