REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Meru Miscellaneous 51 of 2012 LUCYLINE CHURI.............................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS MOSES KITHINJI MUGAMBI............................................................1ST RESPONDENT JOSPHINE NDUMBA..........................................................................2ND RESPONDENT EDITH G. MUGAMBI...........................................................................3RD RESPONDENT PHILUS M. GITUMA KIAMBI.............................................................4TH RESPONDENT MARY N. KIAMBI................................................................................5TH RESPONDENT RULING I agree with counsel for the 3rd to 5th Respondents that the applicant has failed to prosecute the application even after having taken part in the fixing of the hearing date. The application is not supported by any of the parties. In the circumstances, the application bought to this Court by way of Notice of motion on 18th June, 2012 is hereby dismissed with costs to the Respondents. WRITTEN AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT ON 11TH MARCH, 2013. P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE
Original judgment
Lucyline Churi v Moses Kithinji Mugambi & 4 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.