Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4685 of 2013

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Mombasa Criminal Appeal 151 of 2011 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 158 of 2011 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Taveta – C. N. Ndegwa (SRM)) SAYONI OLE PAYAL ………………………….................................……….…. APPELLANT - Versus REPUBLIC ……………………………………..............................……….… RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The Appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for the offence of Stealing Stock contrary to Section 278 of the Penal Code. He had been jointly charged with another man by the name of Mwana Mutupulwa (2nd accused). The particulars of the charge sheet were that on the 15th day of May 2009 at around 2.00pm at Njoro Village within Taita Taveta County, they stole one cow brown in colour valued at Kshs. 30,000/- the property of Sikoyo Ole Moyiani. The Appellant in this case pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. His colleague pleaded not guilty, had his case heard to conclusion and was found guilty and convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. The offence of stock theft attracts a maximum sentence of 14 years. The Appellant in this case pleaded guilty to the charge and did not waste judicial time. The trial Magistrate should have born this in mind when meting out the same imprisonment term as the 2nd Accused. The imprisonment term of five years is hereby reduced to three years. He will now serve three years. To that extent only does his appeal succeed. Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 20th day of March, 2013. M. MUYA JUDGE In the presence of:Mr. Jami for State

page 1 of 2

Accused - present Court clerk – Mr. Musundi M. MUYA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.