REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts) Petition 465 of 2012 BETWEEN ELIZABETH NJERI HINGA ............................................................................... PETITIONER AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY .......... 1ST RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ......................................... 2ND RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT, KIBERA ....................................4TH RESPONDENT RULING This matter concerns certain enforcement proceedings by NEMA against the petitioner. The petitioner seeks to prohibit of criminal proceedings. The interested parties’ are residents of the area affected by the conduct of the petitioner subject of the proceedings. In my view, the community interests are well represented by NEMA, the prosecuting authority. I am also of the view that joining the proposed interested party would obscure the real issues in the matter which deal with administrative and prosecutorial misconduct by NEMA and not the general property rights of the residents of the area. I therefore dismiss the proposed interested parties Chamber Summons dated 6th February 2013 with no order as to costs. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 8th March 2013 D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE ORDER – (1) Ruling read and delivered in open court. (2) Mention on 20.3.2013. Notice to issue. D.S. MAJANJA JUDGE Mr Kago instructed by S. N. Gikera and Associates Advocates for the proposed interested party.
Original judgment
Elizabeth Njeri Hinga v National Environmental Management Authority & 3 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.