REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Mombasa Miscellaneous Application 4 of 2013 1. MURTAZA NAZARALI HASSANALI 2. AKIL ESMAIL HASSANALI……………………….…….APPLICANTS VERSUS WAKF COMMISSIONERS OF KENYA…….……….RESPONDENTS RULING I have considered this originating summons dated 14th February, 2013. The same was served on the Wakf Commissioners but they have not filed any response. Thus the same is unopposed. I have considered the oral submissions made by Mr. Mulwa for the Applicants. I am persuaded by their merit. I therefore do allow prayers (1), (2) and (3) of the summons. I make no orders on costs. Dated and delivered in Mombasa this 28th day of March, 2013 M. ODERO JUDGE
Original judgment
1. Murtaza Nazarali Hassanali 2. Akil Esmail Hassanali v Wakf Commissioners of Kenya
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.