Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Duncan Muchui Kiriiri

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Meru Criminal Case 59 of 2009 REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………………………………PROS VERSUS DUNCAN MUCHUI KIRIIRI………………………………........…………………….ACCUSED RULING The accused DUNCAN MUCHUI KIRIIRI, is charged with an offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on 6th day of June, 2009, at Amugaa sub-location, Gitumbi location, Igembe District within Eastern Province murdered M’totaru M’Raruki Thirari. The prosecution called 7 witnesses who testified in support of the prosecution case. That after close of the prosecution case Mr. Carlpeters Mbaabu, learned Advocate for the accused and Mr. Jackson Motende the learned State Counsel for the Prosecution were invited to make their submissions under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. I have carefully considered the evidence of the seven(7) prosecution witnesses. I have also considered the written submissions by both the prosecution and defence counsel and authorities submitted in support of their respective opposing positions. Having considered the evidence by seven(7) prosecution witnesses, I am satisfied that the evidence on record is sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The accused is therefore put on his defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013. J. A. MAKAU JUDGE Delivered in open court in the presence of: 1. MR. Jackson Motende for State 2. Miss Waithaka for accused. J. A. MAKAU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.