REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Embu Civil Case 83 of 1998 ROBIN GITHINJI...................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS PETER WANJOHI WARUI.........................................1ST DEFENDANT KERUGOYA KUTUS MUNICIPALITY COUNCIL...........2ND DEFENDANT AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT UNDER SECTION 99 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT On 17/4/2013 this file was placed before me with a request that I clarify an issue concerning the size of Plot 90 and Plot 592 each measured 50ft by 100ft. The Deputy Town Clerk stated that Plot 90 initially measured 100ft by 100ft but after subdivision was reduced to 50ft by 100ft. But this subdivision was irregular. And having found that Plot 592 is not part of Plot 90 and that the supposed to have been subdivision of Plot 90 was irregular, I do find that Plot 90 maintains its original size i.e. 100ft by 100ft. I think the clarification has been made, under the provision of Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act upon the request of both parties. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT EMBU THIS 3RD OF MAY 2013. H.I. ONG'UDI JUDGE In the presence of:N/A for or by parties Njue CC
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.