REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL CASE NO. 27 OF 2012 REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT VERSUS KIOKO KITILI MWONGELA …………………….………1st ACCUSED DAVID MUSEMBI NYAMAI ………… 2ND ACCUSED/APPLICANT RULING Following the ruling dated 22/7/2013 and the application for review of the same, I have considered the averments in the further affidavit sworn by the Applicant, David Musembi Nyamai on 19/3/2013. The Applicant has a Constitutional right to a fair trial which entails adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence. This includes being supplied with copies of statements of prosecution witnesses. Whether the Applicant has been supplied with statements or not should not per se be an issue in determining a bail application. The Applicant in the further affidavit has denied any knowledge of the matters raised in paragraph No. 7 of the replying affidavit concerning the deceased herein having been mentioned as a witness in Criminal Case No. 191/2012 at Makueni Law Courts. It is clear from the replying affidavit referred to that the Applicant was not a party to the said Criminal Case at Makueni Law Courts but his co-accused, Kioko Kitili. However the Applicant herein is jointly charged with the said Kioko Kitili. After considering the application, the reply and the further affidavit, I am still not convinced that the Applicant merits to be released on bail pending appeal. I still stand by the ruling herein that the reasons given by the prosecution are compelling to warrant the denial of bail. The application is dismissed. ……………………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE Dated and delivered at Machakos this 25th day of July 2013. ……………………………………… B. THURANIRA JADEN JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.