Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

1. Justine Mwabili Mbachu 2. Stanslas Edward Mjomba v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 183 & 184 OF 2012 1. JUSTINE MWABILI MBACHU 2. STANSLAS EDWARD MJOMBA ….......................………..APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC ……….……....................................................…RESPONDENT (From the Original Conviction and Sentence in the Criminal Case No. 737 of 2010 of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Wundanyi – Orenge - RM) JUDGMENT The two appellants and two others were charged with stealing contrary to section 275 of the Penal Code. They were all Convicted after a full hearing and each Sentenced to four years Imprisonment. The two appellants have now appealed against Conviction and Sentence. The state concedes to the appeal. The stolen items in this case were water pipes. None was found with the appellants. No witness saw them stealing them. The pipes were found in the home of one scarer. This scarer was not one of the Accused persons nor was he a witness. One Mathias who was adversely mentioned by the prosecution witness and another by the name of Njore were not arrested as it is said that they escaped. I do concur with counsel Miss Ogweno for the state that the role the appellants played in the theft of the water pipes is not clear. The Conviction was not safe. It is quashed accordingly and the Sentence set aside. They are set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. Judgment dated and delivered hiss 6th day of August, 2013. …..................... M. MUYA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE 6TH AUGUST, 2013 In the presence of:Learned state Counsel Miss Ogweno The Appellants present Court clerk Mr. Musundi

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.