Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Baikiamba Kirimania v M'mauta Nkari

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU E & L NO. 164 OF 2012 BAIKIAMBA KIRIMANIA..................................................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS M'MAUTA NKARI.............................................................DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Formal proof proceedings in this matter took place on 19.9.2013. The plaintiff told the Court that an Interlocutory Judgment had been entered against the defendant. He also lamented that despite service, the defendant had refused to come to Court.He had also refused to move out of his land Parcel NO.ITHIMA /NTUNENE/40. The plaintiff presented to Court his Title Deed showing that he was the registered owner of land Parcel NO. ITHIMA/NTUNENE/40. He sought the orders contained in his prayers in the plaint. I find that the plaintiff has proved his case. It is ordered as follows: 1. Judgment is entered against the defendant for a permanent injunction restraining him, his agents, servants and/or employees or whomsoever else acting on his behalf or behest from moving into, entering,trespassing,alienating,constructing and/or in any other manner whatsoever from interfering with the plaintiff's ownership, possession, occupation and use of his Land Parcel NO.ITHIMA/NTUNENE/40. 2. An order of eviction of the defendant from the plaintiff's land parcel ITHIMA/NTUNENE/40. NO. 3. Costs of this suit are awarded to the plaintiff. 4. Court orders herein be enforced by the OCS Laare Police Station Dated and delivered in Open Court at Meru this 19th day of September, 2013 in the presence of:

page 1 of 2

Cc. Mwonjaru Baikiamba Kirimania – Plaintiff P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.