Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ayub Muthuri Ikiara v County Council of Meru

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO. 55 OF 2003 AYUB MUTHURI IKIARA.....................................................PLAINTIFF/ APPLICANT VERSUS COUNTY COUNCIL OF MERU.....................................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING The application herein is dated 9th October, 2013 and seeks the following orders: 1. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to grant leave to the Plaintiff/Applicant to further amend the suit herein 2. THAT the Amended Plaint herein be deemed as properly filed. 3. THAT the costs of this Application be in the cause. As the Application is unopposed, it is allowed with respect to prayer No.1. In the circumstances, I give the following orders: 1. The Plaintiff/Applicant is allowed leave to further amend the suit. 2. He should file and serve the amended plaint within 45 days. 3. The draft amended plaint is not deemed as properly filed. 4. Costs should be in the cause. Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 10th day of October, 2013 in the presence of: Cc Mwonjaru Nyenyire h/b Kiambi for Plaintiff/Applicant Kirima h/b for Kiautha Arithi for Defendant/Respondent P. M. NJOROGE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.