Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Paul Owino v Republic & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2011 PAUL OWINO…………………………………………………………………………………….… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………………………….………… PROSECUTOR JUDGMENT The appellant was on 24-9-2010 convicted and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. The offence stealing stock contrary to section 278 of the penal code. The particulars of the charge are that on 18-9-2010 at Kathieno ‘C’ sub location, North East Ugenya location in Ugenya district within Nyanza province stole one brown bull valued at Kshs. 9000/= the property of Peter Opondo Otieno. When the matter came up for plea the appellant pleaded guilty. He has now filed this appeal citing two grounds namely:1.That I am aged 52 years and remorseful for the offence I committed. 2.That the imposed sentence is harsh considering my age. When the appellant appeared in court he stuck to the above grounds save to add that he is actually 62 years old. He appeared obviously old and frail. The state opposed the appeal citing section 348 of the Criminal Procedure Code chapter 75 Laws of Kenya. The learned state counsel conceded though that the issue of sentencing is discretionary and left it to the court. I have evaluated the evidence on record and seen the appellant’s demeanor in court. I agree that he is old and generally frail. Consequently, and prior to arriving at the necessary conclusion it is imperative to receive a report from the probation office located within the appellant’s area. Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 30th day of January, 2012. H.K. CHEMITEI JUDGE

page 1 of 2

HCK/va

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.