Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

1. Irene Wambui Mathenge 2. Timothy Wachira MATHENGe (Representatives of theestate of Erick Mathenge Wambui) v David Ogutu Michira

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 114 OF 2012 1. IRENE WAMBUI MATHENGE 2. TIMOTHY WACHIRA MATHENGe (Representatives of theestate of Erick Mathenge Wambui)…….APPLICANTS VERSUS DAVID OGUTU MICHIRA…....................................................…..…..……………….. ……............................RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is an application for leave to file suit out of time under section 27 of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22 (the Act). The application ought to have been brought by way of originating summons and not by notice of motion (see Order 37, rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (the Rules). But this is only a procedural technicality. The main thing is that the Applicant is before the court, and he has clearly stated in his application what he is seeking. So, I entertained the application. 2. The intended suit is for damages on account of personal injuries suffered in a road accident. Those injuries resulted in the death of the person on whose estate’s behalf the intended suit is to be filed. The provisions of section 27(1) of the Act have thus been met. I am also satisfied from the supporting affidavit that the requirements of section 28 of the Act have also been met. 3. In the circumstances I will allow the application and grant the leave sought. The intended suit must be filed within 21 days of the date of delivery of this ruling. Costs of this application shall be in that suit. It is

page 1 of 2

so ordered. DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2012. H.P.G. WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2012.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.