Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Bus Track Ltd Kenya Bus Services Ltd v Muthiani Kiilu

Editorial Summary 1. Civil Appeal 2. Civil Practice and procedure 3. Subject of subordinate court case DECLARATORY SUIT 3.1 Running down cause 3.2 Motor vehicle accident 3.3 Suit filed at the PM’s court Kikuyu 9/2008 seeking orders for original defendant to settle award. 3.4 Appeal on the original first suit filed PMCC 104/04 as CA 104/09. 3.5 Declaratory suit has hearing to the appeal 104/09 4. Respondent did not participate. 5. Held: a) There be a stay of proceedings pending interparte hearing of application. 6. Case Law: 7. Advocates : i) M Mwangi instructed by Mwangi Kengara & Co Advocates for applicant/respondent

page 1 of 3

ii) L Kimani instructed by Kimani Michuki & Co Advocates for 2nd respondent/2nd appellant iii) M/s Miller & Co Advocates for 1st respondent/1st appellant absent REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Appeal 104 of 2009 BUS TRACK LTD KENYA BUS SERVICES LTD ………..APPELLANT/ ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS VERSUS MUTHIANI KIILU ……………………….RESPONDENT/ ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF (Being an appeal from the Judgment of Hon. M. W. Muigai (Senior Principal Magistrate) in Case No 104 of 2001 dated 4th May 2007 at Kikuyu Courts) RULING Application for stay of proceedings 9th March 2012 I. BACKGROUND 1. A road traffic accident occurred. A suit was filed in the subordinate court at Kikuyu being PMCC 104/04. 2. An award was made against the appellant herein. This appeal file concerns the appeal against that decision being CA 104/09. 3. The respondent in the meantime filed a declaratory suit. This case is still pending. 4. The applicant prays there be stay of execution pending the hearing of the appeal before court. II FINDINGS

page 2 of 3

5. It was noted that the respondent did not participate in this matter. There will nonetheless be status quo/stay of proceedings of the subsequent declaratory suit No. 104/04 PMCC pending the hearing and determination of the application 9th March 2012 interparte. 6. The respondents be served with the application and the orders of this court. 7. There will be costs in the application. DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2012 AT NAIROBI M.A. ANG’AWA JUDGE Advocates : i) M Mwangi instructed by Mwangi Kengara & Co Advocates for applicant/respondent ii) L Kimani instructed by Kimani Michuki & Co Advocates for 2nd respondent/2nd appellant iii) M/s Miller & Co Advocates for 1st respondent/1st appellant absent

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.