Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4513 of 2012

Civil Appeal 118 of 2012 Editorial Summary 1. Civil Appeal 2. Civil Practice & Procedure 3. Subject of Subordinate case: TORT 3.1 Running down case 3.2 Pedestrian/motor vehicle accident 3.3 Sustained injuries 3.4 Defendant denies allegations 3.5 No longer owner of vehicle alleged sold the same. 3.6 Judgment entered exparte against him. Application to amend refused.

page 1 of 4

3.7 4. Prays for stay of execution. Application 16th March 2012: 4.1 That there be stay of execution pending appeal. 4.2 5. Further affidavit filed. Held: Application for stya of execution granted. 6. Case Law: 7. Advocates : i) J L Kariuki holding brief for R M Mutiso instructed by M/s R M Mutis & Co Advocates for appellant/ original defendant. ii) Mwaura Kamau & Co Advocates for respondent/ original plaintiff REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS

page 2 of 4

Civil Appeal 118 of 2012 JAMES NGUGI MWANGI …………………….… APPELLANT/ORIGINAL DEFENDANT VERSUS PETER NGOCHI NDWIGA…….………….………. RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF (Being an appeal arising from the Ruling of Hon. S. Okato (Senior Principal Magistrate) in Case No. 13161 of 2006 dated 20th February 2012 at Nairobi) R U L I N G NO. 2 I. INTRODUCTION 1. This court permitted the applicant to file further affidavit to provide this court with further information on this application. 2. It is hereby been produced. That the applicant had in fact had judgment entered exparte against him. He then applied to have the judgment reviewed. This was in fact refused. The applicant filed application seeking stay of execution. 3. The defence was in fact that the defendant was never the owner of the vehicle. The said defendant has probable success, if the appeal is successful. 4. The applicant prays that stay of execution be given. II FINDINGS 5. The application for stay of execution be and is hereby granted. 6. That the orders be served upon the respondent. 7. The costs in the appeal. DATED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2012 AT NAIROBI

page 3 of 4

M.A. ANG’AWA JUDGE Advocates : i) J L Kariuki holding brief for R M Mutiso instructed by M/s R M Mutiso &Co Advocates for appellant/ original defendant. ii) Mwaura Kamau & Co Advocates for respondent/ original plaintiff

page 4 of 4

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.