REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU Criminal Case 83 of 2007 REPUBLIC…………………………………..……………………PROSECUTOR VERSUS JULIUS LESHO TENGESI……………………...………………..1ST ACCUSED GEORGE KIMANI KINOTI……………………..…………………2ND ACCUSED RULING I have now had opportunity to review the prosecution\'s evidence. I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie against both accused to the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 of the Penal Code, (Cap. 63, Laws of Kenya). In exercise of the powers conferred upon this court by virtue of the provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 75, Laws of Kenya), I put each of the accused to his defence and remind each of them of his constitutional and statutory rights (a) to give evidence on oath, and be thereby be subject to cross examination by the prosecution; (b) to give an unsworn statement, and thereby be not subject to cross-examination; or (c) to remain silent. Each of the accused will indicate which of these three rights he will exercise through submission of his counsel upon the hearing of the defence case. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 18th day of May, 2012 M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.