Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4168 of 2012

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Succession Cause 2004 of 1998 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN OWUOR ADUDA–(DECEASED) RULING In the course of writing my ruling pursuant to the exparte proceedings of 24th April 2012, it became clear that this summons for revocation dated 5th March 2012 ought not to have been heard on that day. The matter had been listed for directions but counsel had served a hearing notice, as is evident from the affidavit of service filed on 20th April 2012 which was handed to the court on the morning of 24th April 2012. I choose to believe that learned counsel, Mrs. Njogu acted inadvertence and had no intention to mislead the court to hear the matter when the same was for directions. Upon perusal of the affidavits filed in support of the summons, I am of the considered view that viva voce evidence is necessary and that Ms. Betty Murungi, Advocate mentioned by both deponents of the supporting affidavits ought to be served with the application inorder that she makes the necessary representations as regards the depositions touching on her involvement. In view of the above the exparte proceedings of 24th April 2012 are hereby struck out. Directions are hereby given that the matter proceeds by way of viva voce evidence on a date to be taken at the registry. The respondent and Ms. Betty Murungi to be served with the hearing notice. Ms. Murungi to be served with the application as well. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED and DELVIERED at NAIROBI this 7th DAY OF June, 2012. M.G. MUGO JUDGE

page 1 of 2

In the presence of : for the applicant. for the respondents.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.