REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT EMBU MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION 185 OF 2011 GEOFFREY NGATU GITHETHUKI.........................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ALEX MURIITHI KANGANGI.........................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING This is the Applicant’s application (Notice of Motion) dated 18/10/2011 brought under section 79G Civil Procedure Act, Order 50 rule 6 and Order 51 rule 1 Civil Procedure rules for enlargement of time for filing an appeal against the Ruling of the Senior Resident Magistrate Wanguru dated 25/1/2011. Without even going into the merits of this application I find no evidence of leave to file appeal having been sought before the trial Court. The order being appealed from is not one of those covered under Order 43 Civil Procedure Rules. The Applicant is advised to go to the lower Court for leave as provided for under Order 43 rule (3) Civil Procedure Rules before refilling his application Application is therefore incompetent and is struck out with costs. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT EMBU THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2012. H.I. ONG’UDI JUDGE In the presence of; Mr. Nyaga for P.N. Mugo for Applicant Mr. Kahiga for Respondent Njue – C/c
Original judgment
Geoffrey Ngatu Githethuki v Alex Muriithi Kangangi
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.