REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL CASE 29 OF 2006 REPUBLIC.........................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS JOSHUA WANO MATAMBO..................................................ACCUSED RULING Having considered the testimonies of the four (4) witnesses who were presented by the prosecution in support of the charge, I am satisfied that a prima facie case as defined in the case of Bhatt -Vs- Republic [1957] E.A. 334 has been demonstrated against the accused person for him to answer. I accordingly, put him on his defence. Order accordingly. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT ELDORET THIS 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2012 F. AZANGALALA JUDGE Read in the presence of:Mr. Chirchir for the State and Mr. Obudho H/B for Kigamwa for the accused person. F. AZANGALALA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.