Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Bonar (e.a) Limited & 1 other v Ashut Engineers Ltd

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts) Civil Appeal 144 of 2012 Editorial Summary 1. Civil Appeal 2. Security of costs BONAR (E.A) LIMITED ………..... APPELLANT/ ORIGINAL DEFENDANT STEPHEN REUBEN KARUNDITU ELIUD NJOROGE ……...…….....…………….…..………... APPELLANTS VERSUS ASHUT ENGINEERS LTD ………. RESPONDENT/ ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF (Being an appeal against the ruling of Hon. A.K. Ndungu, Senior Principal Magistrate on 21st May of 2007 in CMCC No. 11381 of 2005 at Milimani Commercial Courts) RULING NO. 2 1. The parties addressed this court on the issue of costs. The applicant having been granted stay of execution herein has requested that security be varied. 2. The respondent would feel reassured if stay is granted, security of costs be provided. 3. That this be by way of banker’s guarantee on a deposit of Ksh. 200,000/- or in alternative, cash in an interest earning account in names of both advocates. 4. That the directors sign the requisite authority for this security if need be. The security of decretal sum mentioned on 19th July 2012 at 11.00 a.m. DATED THIS 25th DAY OF JUNE 2012 AT NAIROBI

page 1 of 2

M.A. ANG’AWA JUDGE Advocates : i) T.W. Gaita instructed by M/s Gaita Co Advocates for appellant/original defendant ii) T.K. Mbaabu & M/s T.K. Kariba Mbaabu Co Advocates for respondent /original defendant

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.