Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Philemon Kiplagat Kiprono v Wheeler K. Kenei T/A Green Acres Property Solutions

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Eldoret Civil Case 112 of 2011 PHILEMON KIPLAGAT KIPRONO..................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS WHEELER K. KENEI T/A GREEN ACRES PROPERTY SOLUTIONS......DEFENDANT RULING This Chamber Summons has been brought under Order 2 Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules and seeks that the defendant's defence be struck out and that judgment be entered for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint. The application, which is supported by an affidavit sworn on 1st August, 2011 by the plaintiff, is based on the grounds that the defence discloses no reasonable defence; comprises of admissions and is a sham whose purposes is to delay the fair trial of the action. No replying affidavit or grounds of opposition have been filed by the defendant and the evidence contained in the plaintiff's affidavit stands uncontroverted. The affidavit reveals that the plaintiffs claim against the defendant arises from an agreement between him and the defendant in respect of the suit property. The defendant was paid Kshs. 1000,000/- which was the agreed purchase price. The plaintiff also paid Kshs. 32000/- as stamp duty and other related charges. The defendant in his defence admits the agreement but denies failing to perform his part of the bargain contending that he is in the process of transferring the suit land to the plaintiff and that the delay was occasioned by unforeseen circumstances. The plaintiff, through his counsel, abandoned the prayer for specific performance and urged refund of the purchase price plus the said Kshs. 32000/- paid for transfer. Given the evidence detailed above, the defendant's defence to the alternative prayer for refund of Kshs. 1,032,000/- is a sham which does not raise any triable issues and in the premises the plaintiff is entitled to the orders sought in his application under consideration. Accordingly, the application is allowed and judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for Kshs. 1,032,000/- together with costs and interest. The agreement between the parties was silent on the punitive damages payable in the event of default. In the premises, I order that the said sum attracts interest at court-rates from the date of institution of this suit until payment in full. Orders accordingly. DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012

page 1 of 2

F. AZANGALALA JUDGE Read in the presence of:Mr. Mutai for the Appellant. F. AZANGALALA JUDGE 5TH SEPTEMBER, 2012

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.