REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Malindi Civil Suit 105 of 2012 1. UTE HERTHA GOODWIN 2. VIOLET MAY FINLAY.............................................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS BEN KITHI..............................................................................................DEFENDANTS RULING By virtue of Clause No. 2 of the Practice Directions by the Chief Justice gazetted vide Gazette Notice no. 1617 of 9th February, 2012, this court has the necessary jurisdiction. The judges of the Land and Environment Court had not been sworn in to assume office as at 20th September, 2012. The preliminary objection lacks a basis and is dismissed with costs. Now that the Land and Environment Court has been established in this court, I direct that this matter be heard before that court. Delivered and signed at Malindi this 7th day of November, 2012 in the presence of Mr. Bosire advocate for Mr. Kilonzo for the defendants. C. W. Meoli JUDGE 7th November, 2012
Original judgment
1. Ute Hertha Goodwin 2. Violet May Finlay v Ben Kithi
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.