Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Permanent Secretary Ministry of State Provincial Adminstration and Internal Security Commissioner of Police Provincial Commissioner Estern Province Provincial Commissioner Central Province & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Embu Miscellaneous Application 154 of 2012 REPUBLIC ...........…......................................................……..APPLICANT VERSUS PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF STATE PROVINCIAL ADMINSTRATION AND INTERNAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER ESTERN PROVINCE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL PROVINCE.............DEFENDANTS ROSE WANGARI KINYUA......................................................................EX PARTE AND DAVID MUNENE KINYUA (JR) DAVID MUNENE KINYUA T/A ROSKIN AGENCIES...........................................................................APPLICANTS RULING This is the Chamber Summons dated 26/7/2012 brought under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, section 9 & 10 of the Law Reform Act, Section 7-10, 13, 14, 17, 27, 31-32 and Rule 1

page 1 of 2

of the 1st Schedule of the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act 2010. Its seeking for orders of prohibition and mandamus against the Respondents. A statement of facts, verifying affidavit plus annextures have been filed in support of the application. The applicants are complaining about actions of the Respondent which are denying them their source of livelihood. The Respondents though served have not filed any replying affidavit. The Attorney General was also served on their behalf but never filed any papers. Ms. Nyaga appearing for the Applicants on behalf of Mr. Okwaro reiterated that the Applicants were suffering because of the acts of the Respondents. I do find that there is no opposition to the granting of leave to the applicants for Judicial Review. I therefore grant the leave sought for filing Judicial Review for the orders of prohibition and mandamus. The Applicants have also asked that the leave operates as stay. The matters here concern alcoholic drinks. Considering what is within public knowledge concerning alcohol that has taken away lives, its important to know the real content of the alcohol that the Respondents have interfered with. For that reason, I will be reluctant to grant any order staying the actions of the Respondents. I allow the leave sought. The substantive motion to be filed and served within 21 days. Since the business is carried out from Kerugoya the substantive motion should be filed at the High Court Kerugoya. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012. H.I. ONG’UDI JUDGE In the presence of:Ms. Nyaga for Okwaro for Applicant Njue CC

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.