Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Mwang'ombe v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Mombasa Criminal Appeal 354 of 2010 JAMES MWANG'OMBE …......................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …........................................................................ RESPONDENT (From the Original Conviction and Sentence in the Criminal Case No. 606 of 2009 of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Voi – Nyakundi L.M. - RM) JUDGMENT The appellant was Convicted on a charge of grievous harm contrary to section 234 of the Penal Code after full trial and was Sentenced to ten years imprisonment. The punishment provided for under section 234 of the Penal Code is imprisonment for life. This appeal is against Sentence only. The Complainant is the Appellant's daughter-in-law. The Complainant's husband had passed on and then arose a dispute over inheritance which the local administrator had tried to resolve but in vain. On the 10th day of July, 2009 while armed with a Somali sword, the appellant proceeded to severally cut the complainant and she sustained a deep cut wound on the forehead, multiple cuts on both hands, a deep cut wound on the scapula. X-rays showed a dislocation of the left shoulder. The Doctor assessed the degree of injuries as grievous. It is noted that the Accused was treated as a first offender. He is an old man. The imprisonment term of ten years is harsh. It is accordingly reduced to five years imprisonment. The appeal is allowed and succeeds to that extent only. Judgment dated and delivered this 27th day of November, 2012. …................... M. MUYA JUDGE In the presence of:-

page 1 of 2

Mr. Jami for the State The Appellant Court clerk - Musundi

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.