Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 807 of 2012

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts) Winding Up Cause 29 & 30 of 1986 IN THE MATTER OF CONTINENTAL CREDIT FINANCE LIMITED IN LIQUIDATION AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (CAP 486 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA) AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER & LIQUIDATOR OF CONTINENTAL CREDIT FINANCE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)………..APPLICANT RULING By this ex parte application, the Official Receiver and Provisional Liquidator, Continental Credit Finance Limited, prays for leave to pay out of its income and revenue monies owed to fifty six (56) former employees as pension totalling Kshs. 5,549,945.60 only. The application is brought by Notice of Motion dated 18th May, 2011 and taken out under Order 41(1) (1) (d) and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and Section 241(1) (d) of the Companies Act. On 7th August, 1986, this court appointed the Official Receiver as the Provisional Liquidator of Continental Credit Finance Limited (In Liquidation). Under Section 241 (1) (d) of the Companies Act, the Official Receiver is under a duty to pay out in full to creditors the money owed to them when the company is in a position to do so. In this matter, the company has realized sufficient income to pay the fifty six (56) former employees pension dues owed to them amounting to Kshs. 5,549,945.60. Therefore, it is fair and proper that these moneys be paid since the said former employees rank in pari passu with the other unsecured creditors of the company. By reason of the foregoing prayer 1 of the Notice of Motion dated 18th May, 2011 is hereby granted as prayed. Costs in the cause. L. NJAGI

page 1 of 2

JUDGE DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 7th day of November, 2012. ODUNGA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.