Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Jonathan Katana Kenga Gona

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Mombasa Miscellaneous Criminal Application 133 of 2012 REPUBLIC …............................................................................ APPLICANT VERSUS JONATHAN KATANA KENGA GONA …........................... RESPONDENT RULING This application by way of a Notice of Motion is brought under section 348 and 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code and article 48, 5 (III) and 165 (3) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. This application seeks leave to appeal out of time. The grounds are that the Respondent was wrongly acquitted by Kilifi Senior Resident Magistrate in SRMCC 546 of 2008 under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the appellant was not able to lodge his appeal within the stipulated period due to delay in obtaining copies of the proceedings. This application is opposed on the grounds that the application is made two years after the ruling of Honorable P.M. Kiama acquitting the Respondent. I have gone through the pleadings and the rival oral arguments before the Court and I am satisfied that the applicant had made credible efforts to obtain the proceedings of the lower Court. It would not serve the ends of Justice to shut the applicant from its appeal. Every party is entitled to its day in Court. Leave to file appeal out of time is granted as prayed the draft petition is deemed as duly filed and served. Ruling dated and delivered this 7th day of December, 2012. ..................... M. MUYA JUDGE In the presence of:Miss Mwaura for the State Respondent present in person

page 1 of 2

Court clerk – Musundi

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.