Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daniel Maina Gikuna v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Nakuru Criminal Appeal 58 of 2011 DANIEL MAINA GIKUNA...………...……………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………...………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Daniel Maina Gikuna, the appellant herein, was convicted for the offence of preparation to commit a felony contrary too Section 308 of the Penal Code. He had been charged with two other persons. The first accused was acquitted of the offence but the appellant and another were convicted and sentenced to seven (7) years imprisonment each. When the appellant filed his petition of appeal in January 2011, he was aggrieved by both the conviction and sentence and sought to have the conviction quashed and sentence set aside. However, at the hearing of the appeal, the appellant abandoned the appeal on conviction and only asked for leniency on the sentence. He therefore beseeched the court to consider the fact that he has been undergoing rehabilitation for purposes of integration into the society; he has trained in vocational skills which he wishes to put to use; he is remorseful and will live as a law abiding citizen; he is a father of eight children, four of whom are adopted and they all require his support. The state opposed the appeal. Mr. Omutelema, learned counsel for the State submitted that the appellant was given the minimum sentence under Section 308(1) of the Penal Code and the appeal should be dismissed. The appellant was charged under Section 308(1) of the Penal Code which provides as follows:“S308(1). Any person found armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon in circumstances that indicate that he was so armed with intent to commit any felony is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment of not less than seven years and not more than fifteen years.” It is clear that the minimum sentence is seven (7) years imprisonment. The appellant was handed the minimum sentence which is legal and fair in the circumstanes and the court cannot interfere with it. For that reason, the appeal is dismissed, and the sentence confirmed. It is so ordered. DATED and DELIVERED this 7th day of December, 2012. R.P.V. WENDOH JUDGE PRESENT: The appellant – in person Mr. Omwenga for the State Kennedy – Court Clerk

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.