Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 4127 of 2011

REPUBLICOF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 22 OF 2007 REPUBLIC ………….………………….........................................................………. PROSECUTOR -VERSUSREUBEN MATIRO MBILISHE …….......................................................................…….… 1ST ACCUSED CHRISTINE MKAMBURI KALUTU ….........................................................................….... 2ND ACCUSED RULING The two accused persons namely REUBEN MATIRO MBILISHE (hereinafter referred to as the 1st accused) and CHRISTINE MKAMBURI KALUTU (hereinafter referred to as the 2nd accused) were arraigned before the High Court in Mombasa where they were jointly charged with the offence of MURDER CONTRARY TO SECTION 203 as read with S. 204 OF THE PENAL CODE. The State led by MR. ONSERIO, learned State Counsel called a total of ten (10) witnesses in support of their case. MR. MWAKIRETI learned counsel appeared for both accused persons. I have carefully considered the evidence of the ten prosecution witnesses. With respect to the 1st accused I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been shown against him. As such I do rule that the 1st accused shall be called upon to give his defence in compliance with S. 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. As concerns the 2nd accused I find that no prima facie case has been made out against her (reasons for this finding will be included in my final judgement). I therefore enter a finding of ‘not guilty’ with respect to the 2nd accused under S. 306(1) of the Penal Code. I direct that she be set at liberty forthwith unless she is otherwise lawfully held. Dated and Delivered in Mombasa this 11th day of February 2011. M. A. ODERO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.