Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Land and Environmental Law Division v David Thuo

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI LAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW DIVISION CIVIL SUIT (ELC) NO.33 OF 2008 RAPHAEL NGUGI GITHUKU…………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VERSUS DAVID THUO……………………….DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING 1. By a notice of motion dated 22nd October, 2010, Raphael Ngugi Githuku, who is the plaintiff in this suit (hereinafter referred to as the applicant), seeks to have the defendant David Thuo, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), committed to civil jail for contempt of court orders made on 5th May, 2008. The applicant swears that contrary to the consent order made by Osiemo J. on 5th May, 2008, that no construction shall be undertaken on the suit properties pending the hearing and determination of the plaintiff’s suit, the respondent is continuing with construction on the suit property. The applicant contends that the respondent is aware of the court order, having been served with the order and the penal notice on 21st October, 2010. 2. The respondent objects to the application. He swears that since the order in the suit property was made, he has not carried out any construction on the suit property. He therefore denies being in contempt of the court order. 3. I have considered the application before me. Although the applicant contends that the respondent is in contempt of the court orders, no evidence has been tendered in support of this allegation. In his affidavit the applicant refers to “information he has received”. However, the applicant has not revealed the source of that information. The copies of photographs annexed to the applicant’s affidavit, shows that there have been trenches dug on the premises for a foundation. That however appears to have been the position on 7th February, 2008 when the applicant filed this suit as paragraph 7 and 8 of the plaint makes reference to the foundation trenches which were being dug on the suit property. Therefore, I find no evidence that the respondent has continued with any further construction. 4. In the circumstances, I find no merit in this application and do therefore dismiss it with costs. Dated and delivered this 4th day of February, 2011 H. M. OKWENGU

page 1 of 2

JUDGE In the presence of: J.K. Gachie for the plaintiff/applicant Ndegwa H/B for the defendant/defendant B. Kosgei - Court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.