Winny Chepkurui v Abercrombie & Kent Ltd & 1 other

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CIVIL APPEAL 165 OF 2007 WINNY CHEPKURUI…….....…………....APPLICANT/RESPONDENT VERSUS ABERCROMBIE & KENT LTD...…..1STAPPELLANT/RESPONDENT STANLEY K. RONO…………...….2ND APPELLANT/RESPONDENT RULING The application before me is seeking that this appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution for the reasons that : i) directions were taken on 10th February, 2009 to the effect that the appeal be prosecuted within 90 days ii) more than seven (7) months had passed since the directions were taken iii) the delay has caused the appellant undue anxiety The application was argued exparte after the respondent failed to reply to it or attend the court when it was argued. The application is brought under Order 41 rule 32 of the revoked Civil Procedure Rules which is on all forms with the present Order 42 rule 35 of the 2010 rules to the effect that, unless within 3 months after the giving of directions the appeal is not set down for hearing by the appellants, the respondent is at liberty to either set it down for hearing or apply for its dismissal for want of prosecution. Directions having been given on 10th February, 2009 that the appeal be prosecuted within 90 days, the provisions or Order 41 rule 31 aforesaid were satisfied by the time this application was brought on 21st October, 2009 as nearly seven (7) months had lapsed. Indeed today it is two years since the directions were taken and yet the appellants have taken no steps to prosecute the appeal. This application is allowed with costs and the appeal herein dismissed also with costs to the applicant.

page 1 of 2