Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Abdub Bonaya Balo v Republic & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU HCCRA NO. 105 OF 2009 ABDUB BONAYA BALO.............................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.................................................................................................RESPONDENT LESIIT J. (From the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 101 of 2009 of the Senior Resident Magistrate court at Marsabit Hon Mr. J. Kiarie). JUDGEMENT The appellant ABDUB BONAYA BALO was committed on his own plea of guilty to two counts of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. He was aggrieved by the convictions and sentence and therefore filed this appeal. The application has raised five grounds of appeal which are: 1. That, the learned trial magistrate erred in law when he failed to comply with provisions of section 198 CPC laws of Kenya. 2. That the learned trial magistrate erred in law when he failed to explain the substance of the

page 1 of 2

charge to the appellant as law requires in section 207(1) of the CPC. 3. That the trial magistrate erred in facts when he failed to caution the appellant upon the seriousness of the charge. 4. That the trial magistrate erred in both law and facts when he failed to put the second count in abeyance. 5. That the appeal here has been drafted without the lower court proceedings hence I pray to be served with the same to enhance me draft further firm supplementary grounds of appeal. Dated Signed and delivered at Meru this 24TH day of March 2011 LESIIT, J JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.