Mathew Cheruiyot & 1 other v Annah Bwokeny & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO CIVIL SUIT NO. 80 OF 2001 (O.S) MATHEW CHERUIYOT……….......……………………………………1ST PLAINTIFF JULIANA CHERUIYOT………............………………………………... 2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS ANNAH BWOKENY…………………...…...........................................1ST DEFENDANT RECHO SIOROR………………………..……………………………2ND DEFENDANT ANNAH SIOROR……………………...………………………………3RD DEFENDANT RULING The Plaintiffs, Messrs Mathew Cheruiyot and Juliana Cheruiyot, had filed suit by way of Originating Summons on 15th October 2001 seeking declarations as to whether their deceased father, Cheruiyot Arap Tele had been in possession and occupation of the Land title No. Kericho/Kaptatet/1439 adversely to the title of the registered proprietor. The suit was dismissed on 23rd October 2009. They are still in possession of the land. But they did not appeal against the judgment of the Court. The Defendants now seek orders that the Plaintiffs show cause why they should not give vacant possession of the land to the Defendants. As the Plaintiffs did not oppose the application by filing either grounds of opposition or a replying affidavit, the Defendants’ application proceeded to hearing without opposition. Mr. N. O. Migiro, learned Counsel for the Defendants, urged the court to allow the application and grant the orders sought. I have duly perused the application and considered the submission by Mr. Migiro. I am satisfied that the Defendants are entitled to the orders they seek. Accordingly, I allow the application and grant the orders sought. I also order that the Plaintiffs shall appear in this Court on 11/4/2011 to show cause why they should not give vacant possession of the suit land to the Defendants. The costs of this application shall be borne by the Plaintiffs. DATED at KERICHO this 16th March Day of March, 2011 G B M KARIUKI, SC RESIDENT JUDGE

page 1 of 2