REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 85 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BENJAMIN KIPKEMOI METET …………………..DECEASED VERSUS LILY CHEPKETER METET …………………..1ST PETITIONER ALFRED CHEPKWONY METET ……………2ND PETITIONER RULING The Applicants have come again for a special Grant. But they have had since July, 2010 (when they sought and obtained special Grant that facilitated their access to Shs. 189,000/=) to apply for a full grant. Since that time, they have made no efforts to seek a full grant. They have rushed to court again seeking another special grant so as to access Shs. 262,000/=. They have failed to assign reasons why they did not seek a full grant after July, 2010 when they obtained orders to access Shs. 189,000/=. It is patently clear that the Petitioners are abusing the court process in seeking special grants. I refuse to allow them to continue to abuse the court process. The Applicants shall seek a full grant. The Petition is struck out on the ground that it is an abuse of the court process. DATED at KERICHO this 2nd day of March 2011 G.B.M. KARIUKI,sc RESIDENT JUDGE COUNSEL APPEARING Mr. Maengwe Advocate for the Petitioner Court Clerk – Mr. Koech
Original judgment
Benjamin Kipkemoi Metet v Lily Chepketer Metet & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.