Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Turibu Mberia & 1 other v Margaret Kiinge & 1 other

CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE · Stay pending appeal. REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU HIGH COURT CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 27 OF 2010 TURIBU MBERIA ………..…………………………….. 1ST APPELLANT MUTUMA MBERIA …………………………………… 2ND APPELLANT KAVIRIA M’BIRITHIA (Legal representative of M’Birithia M’Ithiringa) RD ……………………………… 3 APPELLANT VERSUS MARGARET KIINGE ……………………………….. RESPONDENT RULING The appellant filed his appeal against the judgment in CMCC Meru No. 983 of 1998 delivered on 3rd March 2010. The appellant by Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2010 seeks stay of execution of that judgment pending appeal. The appellants deponed in their supporting affidavit that their appeal has high chances of success. That if stay of execution is not granted the respondent will evict them from their commercial property. That the chief magistrate court by its judgment ordered the transfer into the respondent’s name parcel number Athinga/Athanga/5456 (whole) and 0.02 of parcel number Athinga/Athanga/5593. The application for stay of execution was opposed by the respondent and prayed in her replying affidavit that this court would order the parties to continue using the land they have been using pending appeal. The respondent argued to grant the orders of status quo may lead to her and her son’s eviction from the commercial property which is on the suit property. Having considered the application and having also considered the concession made by the respondent I grant the following orders:1. The court does hereby stay the transfers ordered in CMCC Meru 983 of 1998 of parcels number Athinga/Athanga/5466 and 5593. 2. The orders of stay in number (1) above cannot operate to displace either the appellants or the respondents from the portions they occupy and used prior to the judgment of CMCC Meru 983 of 1998 delivered on 3rd March 2010. All parties are to continue occupying the portions they have occupied prior to that judgment.

page 1 of 2

3. The costs of the Notice of Motion dated 14th June 2010 shall be in cause. Dated, signed and delivered at Meru this 13th day of April 2011. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.