Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen T. Roy & 1 other v Caleb Okechi Otwili

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NUMBER 427 OF 2007 STEPHEN T. ROY......................................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF MARGOT P. ROY. ....................................................................................2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS CALEB OKECHI OTWILI...............................................................................DEFENDANT RULING This is a Notice of Motion filed under Order 27Rule 4(1) (a) and Order 50 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (Cap 21). It was dated 12th November, 2009 and filed on behalf of STEPHEN T. ROY and MARGOT P. ROY (suing as administrators of the estate of JESSICA LINDSEY ROY). The prayers in the application are as follows:1. THAT this Honourable court be pleased to issue a commission for the examination of the plaintiffs who are resident outside this Honourable Court’s jurisdiction. 2. THAT the commission aforesaid be issued to Mr. Michael Churbrich Esq. 3. THAT the cots of this application be in the cause. The application has grounds on the face of the Notice of Motion. It was filed with a supporting affidavit sworn on 12th November, 2009 by MARGOT P. ROY.

page 1 of 2

When the application came up for hearing on 4th February, 2011, Mr. Mbaluto who appeared for the applicants informed me that the defendant CALEB OKECHI OTWILI was not present and had never entered appearance. Indeed, I see from documents filed herein that service on the defendant was done through substituted method of advertisement in the Daily Nation Newspaper on 15th November, 2009. No appearance was filed however by the defendant. Under Order 27 Rule 4(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, this court has jurisdiction to issue a commission for the examination of a witness outside jurisdiction. I am informed that the plaintiffs herein are residents of New Hampshire USA. They have found it difficult to travel to Kenya for formal proof evidence in this case. The application, is not opposed. A suitable commissioner has been identified. I will therefore, allow the application in the interests of justice. For the above reasons, I allow the application and order as follows: 1. A Commission for the examination of the plaintiffs who are resident outside this court’s jurisdiction is hereby issued. 2. The commission aforesaid is issued to Mr. Michael Churbrich Esq. 3. Costs in the cause. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of March, 2011. ………………… GEORGE DULU JUDGE In the presence Mr. Mbaluto for plaintiffs C Muendo – court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.