Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James M’ngaruthi M’rintari & 1 other v Muguna M’rintari

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU HIGH COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 35 OF 2002 JAMES M’NGARUTHI M’RINTARI ………..………………….. 1ST PLAINTIFF SILAS KIRIGIA M’RINTARI ……………….………………….. 2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUGUNA M’RINTARI …………………….....…………………… DEFENDANT RULING This suit was initially filed by two plaintiffs but subsequently, the second plaintiff died. The suit was marked as having abated in respect of that plaintiff. The court commenced receiving evidence in this case on 14th July 2009. The evidence of PW1 and 2 evidence was recorded by Emukule J. I received the rest of the evidence of the plaintiff and the defendant. Judgment was to be delivered today. In my perusal of this file, I found that on 26th May 2008 this suit was dismissed under the provisions of order XVI rule 6 of the amended Civil Procedure Rules. This case therefore as from 26th May 2008 stood as dismissed and there was no basis of receiving the party’s’ evidence either by Justice Emukule or by myself. It is for that reasons that I decline to write a judgment. The case stands as dismissed and I hereby set aside the proceedings of 14th July 2009 and of 19th October 2010, 19th January 2011 and 20th January 2011. I hereby discharge the injunction issued in favour of the plaintiffs in this case. Dated, signed and delivered at Meru this 18th day of May 2011. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.