Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic & 1 other v District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Igembe District & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU MISC. APPLICATION CASE NO. 73 OF 2009 REPUBLIC ...........................................................................................................................................APP LICANT VERSUS DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER IGEMBE DISTRICT ..........RESPONDENT SAMUEL MBATARU.............................................................................................................INTERESTED PARTY GEOFFREY KAGOJI AKWALU .................................................................................... EX PARTE APPLICANT RULING The ex parte applicant Geoffrey Kajoi Akwalu now deceased obtained leave of the court on 19th October 2009 to apply for orders of certiorari and mandamus to issue against the decision of the District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Igembe District of 29th April 2009. The substantive Notice of Motion was dated 2nd November 2009. An application is now made by Alexander Meeme Kajoi seeking to substitute the deceased ex parte applicant in this matter. He obtained a limited grant authorizing him to prosecute this case under Succession Cause No. 150 of 2010 in Meru High Court. The application by Alexander is therefore merited and is granted to the effect that Alexander Meeme Kajoi do hereby substitute Geoffrey Kajoi Akwalu. The said Alexander Meeme Kajoi shall within 21 days from this date hereof file an amended notice of Motion reflecting his name as the ex parte applicant. There shall be no orders as to costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Meru this 18th day of May 2011.

page 1 of 2

MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.