REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 106 OF 2007 REPUBLIC……………………………..……………………………………………PROSECUTOR VERSUS ISAAC NGIGE KAMAU………………………..…………….………………………ACCUSED RULING I have now had opportunity to peruse the prosecution evidence on record in this matter, and concluded that the prosecution has established a prima facie case which has persuaded me to put the accused on his defence. In accordance with the provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, (Cap. 75, Laws of Kenya), the accused is reminded of his statutory right to give evidence on oath and to call witnesses to testify on his behalf, and thereby be subjected to cross-examination, or to give an unsworn statement and be not subjected to cross-examination or to remain silent. The accused is called upon through his Advocate on record to elect which of these rights he chooses to exercise for purposes of record and further proceedings in this matter. It is so ordered. Dated, signed and delivered at Nakuru this 20th day of May 2011 M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.