Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2254 of 2011

No. 2813 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 36 OF 2009 REPUBLIC..................................................................................................PROSECUTOR -VERSUSJENES BIKERI ONDIEKI MOCHA.....................................................................ACCUSED RULING I have carefully read and considered the evidence so far adduced by the prosecution and I am satisfied that it is sufficient to call upon the accused to defend himself. Accordingly, it is my ruling that the prosecution have prima facie established a case against the accused to warrant the accused being placed on his defence and I so rule. Pursuant to section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I will now invite the accused to indicate to me how he intends to defend himself. He is reminded nonetheless that he can do so by giving a sworn statement, unsworn statement or even keep quite. In the event that he elects to give a sworn statement, he will be liable to cross-examination by the prosecution. However if he chooses to give unsworn statement or keep quiet, he will not open himself up to cross-examination. In all cases though, he is entitled to call witness. Ruling dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 23rd May, 2011. ASIKE-MAKHANDIA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.