Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2020 of 2011

No. 2808 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO. 68 OF 2009 REPUBLIC …………………………………………… PROSECUTOR -VERSUSGERALD OMARE ………….……….…………………..1st ACCUSED ROBERT MIYIENDA OMBONGI …………………..…2nd ACCUSED NICODEMUS ARASA NYAKOIRO..…………………..3rd ACCUSED RULING I have carefully read and considered the evidence so far adduced by the prosecution and I am satisfied that it is sufficient to call upon the accused to defend themselves. Accordingly, it is my ruling that the prosecution have prima facie, established a case against each accused to warrant them being placed on their defences and I so rule. Pursuant to section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I will now invite the accused to indicate to me how they intend to defend themselves. They are reminded nonetheless that they can do so by giving a sworn statement, unsworn statement or even elect to keep quite. In the event that they elect to give sworn statements, they will be liable to cross-examination by the prosecution. However if they choose to give unsworn statements or to keep quiet, they will not open themselves up to cross-examination. In all cases though, they are entitled to call witness. Ruling dated, signed and delivered at Kisii this 30th day of May, 2011. ASIKE-MAKHANDIA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.