Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court of Kenya v Dr. Florence Mukii Mukita

REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 525 OF 2008 DR. CHRISTOPHER MUTHINI MBATHA ……………….PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT VERSUS DR. FLORENCE MUKII MUKITA…………………………. DEFENDANT/APPLICANT RULING This is an application by way of Notice of Motion dated 11th March 2011 filed on behalf of the defendant/applicant. It was brought under Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules (Cap.21). The proper provision of the law should be Order 50 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and section 51 of the Advocates Act (Cap.16). It is an application for judgment to be entered on taxed party and party costs. The application was served on the advocates for the respondent M/s Kalove & Company on 23/3/2011. However, no response was filed. The application therefore stands unopposed. A copy of the certificate of taxation signed by the Deputy Registrar on 1st February 2011 is annexed to the application. I therefore find no reason not to allow the application, since the application is unopposed. Consequently, I allow the application and grant prayer 1. The plaintiff/respondent will pay the applicant costs of the application. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 12th day of July 2011. ……………………… GEORGE DULU JUDGE In the Presence of:No appearance for Plaintiff/Respondent No appearance for Defendant/Applicant Catherine – Court clerk

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.