REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 15 OF 2006 REPUBLIC……………………………………………....…………….…………………PROSECUTOR VERSUS JULIUS NGETHE NJUGUNA…………………..…………………..…..………………….ACCUSED RULING I have now had an opportunity to review the evidence adduced by the prosecution. I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused, and I accordingly put the accused to his defence. In accordance with the requirements of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, (Cap. 75, Laws of Kenya) the accused is reminded of his statutory rights (1) to give evidence on oath and to call witnesses to testify on his behalf. If he elects to give sworn testimony, he will be liable to cross- examination, or (2) to give an unsworn statement and escape cross-examination, or (3) to remain silent. The accused is asked through his Advocate on record to State which of these rights he will exercise. Dated, delivered and signed at Nakuru this 1st day of July 2011 M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.