Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

To File A Motion For & 1 other v Bahati Land Disputes Tribunal & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 114 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE MWANGI GITHENDU AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY GEORGE MWANGI GITHENDU FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI & PROHIBITION AND IN THE MATTER OF NAKURU LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 22 OF 2010 REPUBLIC.....................................................................................................................................APPLIC ANT VERSUS BAHATI LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL...........................................................................1ST RESPONDENT CHIEF MAGISTRATE, NAKURU LAW COURTS..........................................................2ND RESPONDENT EX-PARTE GEORGE MWANGI GITHENDU.......................................................................................................SUBJECT PETER MIRURU NG'ANG'A.........................................................................................INTERESTED PARTY RULING

page 1 of 3

George Mwangi Githendu the ex parte applicant, seeks orders of certiorari to quash to the decision of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal made on 8th September 2010 determining and confirming ownership of the parcel of land known as Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/4220 to Peter Miruru Nganga (the Interested Party) and an order of prohibition against the Respondent. Although Mr. Kimatta who appeared for the Interested Party argued strongly that the decision of the Tribunal was within its mandate, it was quite clear from Mr. Githui, counsel for the ex parte Applicant's arguments, that the Tribunal had no such jurisdiction. If there was any doubt as to the nature of the Ruling, it was this "RULING Bahati Land Disputes Tribunal after perusing all the documents availed by the two parties and oral questions we arrived at the following ruling: 1. The claimant MR PETER MIRURU NG'ANG'A is the sole owner OF A PLOT excised from Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/4230 of which they named PHASE III. 2. The Bahati Land Disputes Tribunal requests the Hon. Court to compel the Chairman of KIUGU FIELD SCHOOL to issue Mr. PETER MIRURU NG'ANG'A a title deed to his plot in Phase II. CONSTANCE W. NJOROGE - Chairman - Signed DAVASON K. GICHUKI - Member - Signed EVANSON KANGWANA - Member - Signed" The mandate of Land Tribunals is stated, and restricted by Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act, 1990 (No. 18 of 1990) to decisions on - (a) determination on boundaries to land; (b) claims to occupy land; (c) trespass to land. The Ruling clearly refers to ownership of land and even directs the court to issue a mandatory injunction against the Chairman of a school called KIUGU FIELD SCHOOL. The Bahati Lands Disputes Tribunal not only had no jurisdiction to make such orders, but also exercise powers which it did not have or are not vested in it. For those reasons, I allow the ex parte Applicant's Notice of Motion dated and filed on 10th December, 2010 in terms of the three prayers. There shall be orders accordingly.

page 2 of 3

Dated, delivered and signed at Nakuru this 1st day of July 2011 M. J. ANYARA EMUKULE JUDGE

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.