Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Patrick Daniel

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL CASE NO. 77 OF 2005 REPUBLIC..............................................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS PATRICK DANIEL.........................................................................................ACCUSED RULING The accused, PATRICK DANIEL LESADALA, is on trial for the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The victim of murder was DIANAH KARAMBU NTHIBA. The doctor who conducted the post-mortem examination on the body of the deceased ascertained that the cause of death was a chest injury due to gunshot wounds. There have been suggestions that the accused was issued with a firearm from the armoury store at the Kamiti Maximum Security Prison. There are further suggestions that on the material day, the accused surrendered the firearm together with some spent and some live ammunition. The evidence further indicates that the accused owned-up to having killed a lady. The accused is said to have told some of the prosecution witnesses, that the lady he had allegedly killed, was his girlfriend. Furt hermore, the son of the victim testified that he saw the accused shoot the deceased. From the totality of the evidence already on record, I am satisfied that the prosecution has made out a prima facie case against the accused person. If the accused did not say anything in his defence, the evidence already adduced may be sufficient to lead to his conviction. Therefore, I do find and hold that the accused has a case to answer. He is thus put to his defence. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 5th day of October, 2011

page 1 of 2

.................................... FRED A. OCHIENG JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.