Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Richard Milimbwa

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 94 OF 2009 REPUBLIC ………………………………………..…………… PROSECUTOR VERSUS RICHARD MILIMBWA ……………………………………........……. ACCUSED RULING After carefully considering the evidence of the 6 prosecution witnesses, I hereby find that the accused has a case to answer in terms of Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In that regard, the accused has a right to give evidence on his own behalf or to make any unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence. In the event that the accused opts to give an unsworn statement, then he will not be subjected to any cross examination. However, when the accused gives a sworn statement, he will be allowed to call witnesses but will be cross examined. Lastly, in the event that the accused opts to keep quiet, then the advocate for the prosecution may sum up the case against the accused. MUGA APONDI JUDGE Ruling read, signed and delivered in open court in the presence of Gitonga for Omari for accused – Present Motende for State – Present MUGA APONDI JUDGE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 GITONGA Accused will give a sworn statement without calling any witnesses. We also pray for a date for the defence case. COURT Defence case will be heard on 10th November, 2011. Accused R.I.C.

page 1 of 2

MUGA APONDI JUDGE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.