Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Sister Mary Aloysie Muthanje v Michael Kathuri Gakuru & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 512 OF 2006 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OFGAKURU KIORUGARI –DSD SISTER MARY ALOYSIE MUTHANJE.....................................APPLICANT VERSUS MICHAEL KATHURI GAKURU..........................................1ST RESPONDENT JOHN NJERU GAKURU.....................................................2ND RESPONDENT RULING The Applicant herein is one of the beneficiaries of the estate of the late Gakuru Kiorugari her father. The Administrator of the estate of the late Gakuru Kiorugari was one Eusephia Kiara Gakuru. She died last year before effectively executing the distribution of estate of Gakuru Kiorugari. The supervision of the distribution can only be done by an Administrator. Right now the estate of Gakuru has no Administrator and the Applicant cannot purport to be so acting. The deceased was also a beneficiary in the estate. This interest must be protected under Section 79 and 82 of the Law of Succession Act. The family should agree on who to substitute as Administrator to replace the late Eusephia Gakuru as Administrator and the relevant application be made. The new Administrator will then pick up from where Eusephia left inorder to supervise the subdivision. Any action will therefore be put on hold awaiting the appointment of a legal representative which I hope will be soon. The Application stands dismissed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT EMBU THIS 18th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. H.I. ONG’UDI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.