Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Chairman Mwea Land Disputes Tribunal & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 48 OF 2009 REPUBLIC………………………... ………………………………………………………………..APPLICANT VERSUS CHAIRMAN MWEA LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL…………………........……………..….…………….………………1ST RESPONDENT SRM WANGURU LAW COURTS……………................…………………………………..2ND RESPONDENT EMMANUEL NJOGU MUCHINA…………….................…….…………………………….3RD RESPONDENT AND JUDY NJERI MICERE..…………………………........…..………..…………………EX-PARTE APPLICANT RULING This is the Applicant’s Application dated 11/9/2009 for leave to file Judicial Review for an order of Certiorari to move into the High Court and quash the award of Mwea Lands Disputes Tribunal and the order of Wang’uru SRM’s court delivered on 26/3/2009. It has been made exparte in line with Order 53 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Rules. Accompanying the Application is: 1. 2. 3. 4. An affidavit of verification Statement of facts Undated proceedings from the Tribunal Proceedings from the Wang’uru SRM’s court. The application for Certiorari has been filed within 6 months of the adoption by the court of the Tribunal’s award. As I said the Award is undated. This is a matter filed in 2009 and I wonder why it has taken this long to be prosecuted. I grant the Applicant leave to file and serve the substantive application within 21 days. I decline to grant the order for stay as it is not merited. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT EMBU THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2011.

page 1 of 2

H. I. ONG’UDI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.