Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Kiiru Mutuva & 1 other v Jane Waithera Mungai & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2002 STEPHEN KIIRU MUTUVA.............................................................................APPELLANT/ ORIGINAL/DEFENDANT VERSUS JANE WAITHERA MUNGAI..........................................................................RESPONDENT/ ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF Editorial Summary 1. Civil Appeal 2. Civil Practice and Procedure 3. Subject of Subordinate Court Case RESTITUTION 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4. Respondent/original plaintiff Distressed over alleged debt owed and or Misappropriated sued appellant/original defendant in Subordinate court Judgment for respondent 30th April 2002 appellant original defendant appeals on 29th May 2002 to the High Court appeal dismissed suit later set aside 8th December 2004 since 1992, no lower court record On 18th September 2010 Respondent original plaintiff passes away Application 12th July 2011 Order 24 r 1 and 4 Civil Procedure Rules to Substitute the deceased with a legal representation Respondent served 5. Held:

page 1 of 3

Application granted. 6. Case Law: 7. Advocates : i) C M Ngugi instructed by M/s Wachira Nderitu & Ngugi & Co Advocates for appellant ii) M/s Mutua Mbugua & Co Advocates for respondent absent REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 253 OF 2002 STEPHEN KIIRU MUTUVA.............................................................................APPELLANT/ ORIGINAL/DEFENDANT VERSUS JANE WAITHERA MUNGAI..........................................................................RESPONDENT/ ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF (Being an appeal from the entire judgment of the Resident Maigstrate Thika, Mr Ngari dated 30th April 2002 in Civil Case No. 1086 of 2002) RULING Application To Substitute Deceased with a Legal Representation I. BACKGROUND 1. The respondent/original plaintiff filed suit in the subordinate court on 26th October 2001. She sued the appellant/original defendant for restitution on grounds that she had been wrongly distressed when all her goods were attached and sold. 2. The trial magistrate entered judgment for the respondent/original plaintiff on the 30th April 2002. 3. Being dissatisfied with the judgment of the subordinate court, the said appellant/original defendant filed appeal to this High Court on 29th May 2002. The appeal was dismissed by Visram J but was later set aside on 8th December 2005. 4. Since 2002, no action had been taken on this matter. No lower court file had been brought to this High Court.

page 2 of 3

5. Unfortunately on the 18th September 2010 the respondent original plaintiff passed away. II APPLICATION OF 12TH JULY 2011 6. Under Order 24 r (1) and (4) Civil Procedure Rules, the advocate for the appellant prayed that the appellant herein be substituted in place of the deceased, as a legal representation. 7. The deceased passed away on the 18th September 2010 and letters of grant al Litum were duly issued. 8. The appellant/original defendants were served through their advocates and are absent. III FINDINGS 9. The application is hereby granted. Leave be is hereby granted to the applicant to come or record on behalf of the deceased as a legal representative. DATED THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2011 AT NAIROBI M.A. ANG’AWA JUDGE Advocates : i) Z. J. Mohammed instructed by M/s Archer & Wilcox & Co Advocates for the Appellant ii) A.M. Simiyui instructed by M/s Musyoka Wambua & Co Advocates for the 2nd Respondent iii) F S Macharia instructed by the firm of Mungai Kalande & Co Advocates for the 1st respondent

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.