Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Naivasha Land Disputes Tribunal & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2011 REPUBLIC.......................................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS NAIVASHA LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL.........................................1ST RESPONDENT NAIVASHA SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT............2ND RESPONDENT AND PETER KAARA MWAURA............................................................. INTERESTED PARTY EXPARTE JOHN RICHARD GITHERE...............................................................................SUBJECT RULING The Notice of Motion is dated 16/03/2011 seeking for orders of certiorari to quash the award of Naivasha Land Disputes Tribunalmade on 23/11/2010 awarding parcel No.153/10 No.Naivasha/Mwichingiri Block 4/3936 to Peter Kaara Mwaura and requiring the applicant to surrender his Title Deed in respect of the said parcel, for cancellation. Further that the order do also apply to quash the order of the Principal Magistrate Court Naivasha in Misc. Application No.35 of 2010 made on 25/11/2010 and its decree issued on 10/12/2010, adopting the Award made by the Naivasha Tribunal. The same was not contested, however applicant’s counsel applied for costs as against the interested party saying costs follows the event – here since the applicant has succeeded then he is entitled to costs,

page 1 of 2

especially bearing in mind that it is the interested party who took the matter before the Land Disputes Tribunal and instituted proceedings without serving applicant. The prayer for costs is opposed. Mr. Karanja for the interested party argues that his clients did not know about issues related to jurisdiction and ought to be excused from paying costs. The application has been necessitated by actions instigated by the interested party. If the matter had proceeded to hearing, costs would have been awarded to the successful party. Applicant’s counsel has had to prepare his application to attend court – and it is only fair that the costs be awarded to the applicant and I so direct. Delivered and dated this 11th day of November, 2011 at Nakuru. H.A. OMONDI JUDGE Mr. Mutonyi for Applicant N/A for Attorney General Interested Party present in person

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.